There ought to be a law…
Truth in advertising should apply to political campaigns, as well. Well, why not? Politicians WANT to lie is why not. What I’m talking about is when politicians lie about each other during a campaign. If Politician A even insinuates that Politician B took bribes Politician B should be able to sue for defamation, or whatever the the appropriate legal area is.
This could also be used as a tool and/or weapon, but a more honest one. Discovery could be a bitch. Maybe Politician B chooses not to sue because it’s true. Eh? Sounds entertaining, if nothing else. I cannot think of something more critically important than voters not being subjected to empty and malicious smear campaigns.
Food pictures should be the actual food being advertised. It’s known advertisers use non-food substances to make their products look better and more appetizing. Glue makes pizza look stretchy and cheesy. Motor oil looks like syrup and doesn’t absorb into pancakes. Motor oil also has been used for beer. Lard is great for ice cream and mashed potatoes. Sorry, but no, if you’re presenting a product you need to present the actual product.
“FREE” You’ve seen and heard it before. “But 2 get 1 free… just pay separate shipping and handling”. “Sign up for our newsletter and we’ll send you a free tote bag(1)”. “(1)” means pay shipping and whatever. I’m not even going to provide a definition because any minimally bright person knows what it means in the non-legal non-courtroom real world. Free should be free should be free. Period. All-inclusive, shipping, handling… what the fuck is “handling”, anyway… any kind of tax, whatever. If you cannot provide it for no cost at all, you should not be allowed to legally make the claim that it is free.
*-Parts 1 and 2 were published under different titles a few years ago. That, or I just want to confuse you and be random.
So, the Oakland A’s are moving. Not official yet, but it’ pretty much a done deal. I’m going to focus more on my emotional feelings and add a bit of historical context so it hopefully makes sense to you.
Mornings. 😐 Ugh. Must we?
You and your sweetie are out for an evening of fine dining. The work day is over and you want to relax and take it easy and let someone wait on you. Kick off your shoes without actually kicking off your shoes. As the Host/Hostess leads you to the table they have selected for you, and it is not to your liking, what do you do? Do you take whatever is offered and say nothing, or do you speak up and ask for an alternate table? Is it okay to tell a restaurant hostess you would rather sit somewhere else other than where they want to place you?
California has issued a policy to
The Grump was talking with his wife this evening… Grumpette???… and this was our topic: Internet passwords are a minefield through which there is no rational and effective way to navigate. Many people like to use the same password for everything, which we all know is not secure, but even if you want to do that no two sites have the same criteria so you can’t do that anyway. Then there’s two-step authentication, which The Grump grudgingly admits is a good security measure, but it’s a pain in the butt… especially when my phone is in another room and I have to get up to retrieve it.
In our daily travels we come across statements from businesses and corporations that, after time, simple aren’t believable anymore. You see or hear them for so long you know they can’t be legit. So let’s cut to the chase and list a few…
The Grump is a participant of social media groups for social interaction and entertainment. They can range from serious and political to irreverently humorous to specific topics such as tv shows, etc., and there’s always some schmuck wanting to ruin everyone else’s fun. You have to ask, “Why are you here?”
We don’t need no pre-amble, let’s just get to it. The title is self-explanatory.